<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FRS102 Propoals to increase Provisions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.creditunionupdate.com/accountancy/frs102-proposals-increase-provisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.creditunionupdate.com/accountancy/frs102-proposals-increase-provisions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:58:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Cunningham		</title>
		<link>https://www.creditunionupdate.com/accountancy/frs102-proposals-increase-provisions/#comment-367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditunionupdate.com/blog/?p=877#comment-367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.creditunionupdate.com/accountancy/frs102-proposals-increase-provisions/#comment-366&quot;&gt;Kenny MacLeod&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Kenny. Further clarification from the regulator regarding how to deal with FRS 102 for quarterly and annual returns would be useful. There are a number of points in FRS 102 that complicate matters but do not add anything to the reader of the accounts such as this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.creditunionupdate.com/accountancy/frs102-proposals-increase-provisions/#comment-366">Kenny MacLeod</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Kenny. Further clarification from the regulator regarding how to deal with FRS 102 for quarterly and annual returns would be useful. There are a number of points in FRS 102 that complicate matters but do not add anything to the reader of the accounts such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenny MacLeod		</title>
		<link>https://www.creditunionupdate.com/accountancy/frs102-proposals-increase-provisions/#comment-366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenny MacLeod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditunionupdate.com/blog/?p=877#comment-366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steven

The trade bodies met with the PRA recently and raised the issue that at 30 Sept 2015 credit unions&#039; bad debt provisions (and loan books) would rise as a result of FRS 102 requiring the write back of loans which had been provided but which were technically still collectable.  My understanding that they are considering how to deal with this.
Regards

Kenny MacLeod]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven</p>
<p>The trade bodies met with the PRA recently and raised the issue that at 30 Sept 2015 credit unions&#8217; bad debt provisions (and loan books) would rise as a result of FRS 102 requiring the write back of loans which had been provided but which were technically still collectable.  My understanding that they are considering how to deal with this.<br />
Regards</p>
<p>Kenny MacLeod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
